Drawing for PROFUSION

USPTO serial 76131477

PROFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristofer E. Elbing

KRISTOFER E ELBING187 PELHAM ISLAND RDWAYLAND, MA 01778-2509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations, namely protein-nucleic acid copolymers for use in biotechnology applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
May 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance