Drawing for INSURANCE.COM

USPTO serial 76131483

INSURANCE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSURANCE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

TIMOTHY H HIEBERT JONES DAYN PT901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing information about insurance and annuities by means of a site on a global computer information networks providing an on line computer database in the field of insurance, for maintaining and organizing insurance information on behalf of policyholders in a secure location, which information can be updated and accessed by means of a site on a global computer network; providing financial information in the field of insurance by electronic means; providing on line quotes on insurance policy premiumsACTIVEFeb 25, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 31, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance