USPTO serial 76131584
OPENPARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENPARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN GEOGHEGAN
BRIAN GEOGHEGAN PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3266UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Leasing access time to a computer database in the fields of electronics, engineering, business management, advertising, finance, telecommunications, entertainment, education, transportation, the Internet and computers; creating indexes of information, sites and other resources on computer networks for others; searching and retrieving information, data, web sites and other resources available on computer networks; computer programming for others; design, drawing and commissioned writing, all for the compilation of web pages on the Internet; creating and maintaining web sites; hosting web sites; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; updating of computer software for others, computer software design for others; consultancy in the field of computer hardware; design and engineering services relating to telecommunications systems and apparatus for others; testing of computing, telecommunication, electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments; computer systems analysis; database development; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software in the fields of electronics, engineering, business management, advertising, finance, telecommunications, entertainment, education, transportation, the Internet and computers; providing non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines and manuals and data, all in the fields of electronics, engineering, business management, advertising, finance, telecommunications, entertainment, education, transportation, the Internet and computers; providing web sites featuring electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines and manuals and data, all in the fields of electronics, engineering, business management, advertising, finance, telecommunications, entertainment, education, transportation, the Internet and computers; rental and leasing of computers and computer systems; rental and leasing of computers and computer software; encryption and decryption of electronic data for others; compilation, creation and maintenance of a register of domain names for others; operating search engines; technical consultation in the field of telecommunications; consultancy, information and advisory services in the fields of computer programming, design of software and web sties, computers, the Internet, electronics, engineering and transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |