USPTO serial 76131734
SCANWOOD SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCANWOOD SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
54700 Pont a Mousson, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
STEWART L GITLER JEFFERSON DAVISHOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3856Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER VISION AND COMPUTER ASSISTED VISION APPARATUS, NAMELY, SCANNERS FOR SCANNING DEFECTS, SORTING AND CUTTING OF WOOD AND POLYMER COMPOSITE MATERIALS, COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR THE COMPUTER VISION AND COMPUTER ASSISTED VISION APPARATUS, NAMELY, SCANNERS | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 1999 |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER VISION AND COMPUTER ASSISTED VISION APPARATUS AND SOFTWARE FOR SCANNING FOR DEFECTS, SORTING AND CUTTING OF WOOD AND OTHER MATERIALS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |