USPTO serial 76131894
WE BRING LIFE TO PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3073874Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE BRING LIFE TO PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee, WI
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
MILWAUKEE, WI
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
MILWAUKEE, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Meddings
LORI S MEDDINGS MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | NON-NUTRITIVE FLAVORINGS AND FLAVOR ENHANCERS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE PRODUCTS, NUTRITIONAL FOOD SUPPLEMENT PRODUCTS, VITAMINS, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PRODUCTS, PET FOOD PRODUCTS, DAIRY PRODUCT, CANDY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS, PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; SPICES AND SEASONINGS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS; PROCESSED HERBS FOR NON-NUTRITIVE PURPOSES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND NUTRITIONAL FOOD SUPPLEMENT PRODUCTS; NON-NUTRITIVE CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS, MIXES AND BASES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD, NUTRITIONAL FOOD SUPPLEMENT PRODUCTS, VITAMINS, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PRODUCTS, PET FOOD PRODUCTS DAIRY PRODUCTS CANDY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS, PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; CANDY, CANDY TOPPINGS AND CANDY INGREDIENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FROZEN CONFECTIONS; FOOD STABILIZERS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS; EMULSIFIERS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS; FOOD THICKENER FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS; YEASTS; YEAST FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PRODUCTS; BIONUTRIETNS, NAMELY YEAST EXTRACTS FOR USE TO SUPPORT OR PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ORGANISMS; NON-NUTRITIVE EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORING FOR FOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Foods Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Foods Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WE BRING LIFE TO PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |