USPTO serial 76131905
NB NEW BREED SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NB NEW BREED SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Roppel
ANDREW ROPPEL KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1001 W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101-2410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, repair, and maintenance services for equipment in the fields of transportation, mail processing, mail sorting and mail delivery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New Breed Transfer Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by New Breed Transfer Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW BREED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named NB NEW BREED SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |