Drawing for RUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 76132207

RUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSHUA D. BRINEN

JOSHUA D BRINEN LEGAL DEPTRUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES515 GRENWICH ST STE 201NEW YORK, NY 10014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN WEB-BASED, MULTI-USER SUBMISSION, EDITING, WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, AND ARCHIVING OF INFORMATION ON INTRANETS, EXTRANETS, AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; FOR USE IN CREATING, MANAGING, AND CHANGING WEB SITES, FOR CREATING, MANAGING, AND CHANGING DATA AND CONTENT, AND DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA FILES SUCH AS MOVIES, SPREADSHEETS, PORTABLE DOCUMENT FILES, SLIDE SHOW PRESENTATIONS, AND ANIMATIONS AND DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA FILES SUCH AS MOVIES, SPREADSHEETS, PORTABLE DOCUMENT FILES, SLIDE SHOW PRESENTATIONS, AND ANIMATIONS, OR OTHER CONTENT, INCLUDING DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA FILES SUCH AS MOVIES, SPREADSHEETS, PORTABLE DOCUMENT FILES, SLIDE SHOW PRESENTATIONS, AND ANIMATIONS STORED IN THE SOFTWARE, THE WEBSITE, AND THE DATABASE UNDERLYING THE WEBSITE, SHARING INFORMATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE REMOTE COMPUTER USERS AND MANAGING BUSINESS COMMUNICATION PROCESSES SUCH AS ASSIGNMENT, APPROVAL, AND WORKFLOWACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 21, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance