Drawing for RUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 76132208

RUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSHUA D. BRINEN

JOSHUA D BRINEN LEGAL DEPTRUNTIME TECHNOLOGIES515 GREENWICH ST STE 201NEW YORK, NY 10014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035CONSULTING, TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER AND HARDWARE PROBLEMS VIA IN-PERSON CONSULTATION, TELEPHONE, FAX, INSTANT MESSENGER SERVICES, OR E-MAIL AND CUSTOMIZATION SERVICES PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH FOR USE IN WEB-BASED, MULTI-USER SUBMISSION, EDITING, WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, AND ARCHIVING OF INFORMATION ON INTRANETS, EXTRANETS, AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; FOR USE IN CREATING, MANAGING, AND CHANGING WEB SITES, DATA AND CONTENT INCLUDING DOCUMENTS AND DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA FILES SUCH AS MOVIES, SPREADSHEETS, PORTABLE DOCUMENT FILES, SLIDE SHOW PRESENTATIONS, AND ANIMATIONS, OR OTHER STORED CONTENT, SHARING INFORMATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE REMOTE COMPUTER USERS AND MANAGING BUSINESS COMMUNICATION PROCESSES SUCH AS ASSIGNMENT, APPROVAL, AND WORKFLOWACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 20, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 15, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 15, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance