Drawing for GERBER PARENTS RESOURCE CENTER

USPTO serial 76132231

GERBER PARENTS RESOURCE CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GERBER PARENTS RESOURCE CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN

RICHARD A FRIEDMAN NOVARTIS CORPORATION564 MORRIS AVESUMMIT, NJ 07901-1315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003baby health and beauty aids, namely, shampoo, face and body moisturizers, face and body wash, foaming mousse body wash, baby oil, baby powder, non-medicated diaper rash ointment and lotion, tooth and gum cleanser for babiesACTIVE—
005baby food and vitaminsACTIVE—
010Baby care items, namely, baby pacifiers, baby bottles, baby bottle nipples, baby teething rings, baby nursers, baby feeding dishes, and non-electric baby bottle sterilizing kits comprised of pans with inset bottle holders, tongs and bottle and nipple brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance