USPTO serial 76132302
MAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2002
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Perth, Western Australia, AU
Perth, Western Australia, AU
Perth, Western Australia, AU
BHP BILLITON IRON ORE PTY, LTD.
PERTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Repper
GEORGE R REPPER ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Mineral ores, namely refractory minerals for use in blast furnaces; metallic ores and ferrous ores for use in blast furnaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BHP Iron Ore Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by BHP Iron Ore Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by BHP Iron Ore Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by BHP BILLITON IRON ORE PTY, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |