USPTO serial 76132320
LUCKY GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUCKY GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St-Romuald, Quebec, CA
St-Romuald, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic gaming and non-gaming systems which are auxiliary to live casino gaming tables and bingo, which promote and manage, namely, computer hardware, led and LCD display units, and computer software used to randomly choose values of jackpots and randomly choose cards, numbers and other symbols associated with live casino table games play, as well as programmable options for playing along with the live casino table games and bingo | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |