USPTO serial 76132390
IMPACT HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMPACT HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Hein
LAURA J HEIN GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT33 S 6TH ST STE 3400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computerized online order service featuring self-testing health products | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 1994 |
| 010 | Medical diagnostic testing services, health screening services and health information programs to promote health awareness | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 1994 |
| 042 | Facilitating exchange of information between and among consumers and physicians, health care clinics, hospitals, health maintenance organizations, pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers through computerized online health risk appraisals, personal health profiles and tracking tools to enable consumers to monitor, manage and maintain their personal health | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |