Drawing for BRANDEDCONTENT

USPTO serial 76132747

BRANDEDCONTENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRANDEDCONTENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norris D. Wolff

NORRIS D WOLFF KLEINBERG, KAPLAN, WOLFF & COHEN, PC551 FIFTH AVE 18TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PREPARING PRINT, AUDIO AND VISUAL PRESENTATIONS FOR USE IN ADVERTISING NAME BRAND PRODUCTSACTIVESep 1, 2000
042DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT OF DATABASES WHICH SERVE THE MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS OF A SPECIFIC BRAND OR GROUP OF BRANDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 21, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 2, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 10, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance