USPTO serial 76132768
3D-JET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3D-JET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee, Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS, SWEENEY, E208TH S LA SALLE ST STE 410CHICAGO, IL 60604-1203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PRINTING MACHINES, AMONGST OTHERS FOR VISCOUS INKS; PRINTING HEADS FOR PRINTING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING MACHINES, FOR REGULATING THE OUTPUT OF PRINTING MACHINES AND FOR IMPROVING THE PRINTING QUALITY AND PRINTING STRUCTURE OBTAINED WITH PRINTING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |