USPTO serial 76133056
ZIPANDSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPANDSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pepper Pike, OH
Pepper Pike, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Auvil
STEVEN M AUVIL BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF L2300 BP TWR200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |