USPTO serial 76133102
HOMELIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMELIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Boots
DANIEL L BOOTS BINGHAM MCHALE, LLC2700 MARKET TWR10 W MARKET STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2982Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Residential building construction, namely , construction of single family homes, townhouses and multi-family apartments | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |