USPTO serial 76133135
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Business transaction software for use by telecommunication utilities and financial service providers, providing product and order management, service provisioning, customer relations, billings and accounts receivable, collection and processing of event records, sales force automation, business intelligence, and e-business | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Licensing of business transaction software for product and order management, service provisioning, customer relations, billings and accounts receivable, collection and processing of event records, sales force automation, business intelligence, and e-business; business and technical consulting services and assistance relating to business transaction software, for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications for use by utilities telecommunication utilities and financial service providers, and providing integration, installation and customization of business transaction software for product and order management, service provisioning, customer relations, billings and accounts receivable, collection and processing of event records, sales force automation, business intelligence, and e-business | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |