USPTO serial 76133796
LEGAL OUTFITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGAL OUTFITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
M4Y 1S2 Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely books, newsletters and brochures in the field of law, insurance, finance and real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | The administration of pre-paid plans including legal plans, insurance plans, financial plans, real estate plans, employee assisted plans, employee benefit plans and collection | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of law, insurance, finance and real estate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |