USPTO serial 76133860
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU P866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video game software; computer game programs; computer game cartridges, discs and cassettes; video computer game programs; home video computer game cartridges, discs and cassettes; game cartridges, discs, cassettes and circuit boards containing game programs for use with hand-held or arcade video game machines with built-in screens; home video game machines for use with televisions; sound and video recordings containing games, music, and related entertainment; interactive television terminal sets; top boxes for the reception of coded or compressed audio, video or data signals; electrical communications apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic cable and satellite receivers for the transmission of games and other computer software via cable television networks and satellite networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Stand alone video game machines; arcade game machines with built-in screens; playthings, namely, dolls | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PBPR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |