USPTO serial 76133977
BABY POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Handforth, Cheshire SK9 3FB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Roxanne Elings
G ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP885 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer programs and software for children's learning activities, hand-held unit for playing electronic games for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper, namely, copy paper, wrapping paper; printed matter and publications, namely, children's picture books and activity books aimed at parents; magazines for children; newsletters for children; albums, namely photograph and stamp albums; pens, pencils, markers, paints, drawing rulers; teaching manuals in the field of children's educational activities; book binding, printing toys, blocks and ink sold as a kit for printing; unmounted and mounted photographs; art prints; tote bags; gift wrapping paper; gift cards; paper serviettes and paper tissues | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action toys (mechanical and electronic), air pistols; baby multiple activity toys; bath toys; bendable toys; music box toys; children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels; construction toys; crib toys; disc toss toys; drawing toys; fantasy character toys; infant toys, inflatable toys; musical toys; party favors in the nature of small toys; play mats containing infant toys; plush toys; pull toys; punching toys; push toys; ride-on toys; sand toys; squeeze toys; stuffed toys talking toys; toys designed to be attached to car seats, strollers, cribs, high chairs, water squirting toys; wind-up toys; cases for play accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |