Drawing for FIRSTRAIN

USPTO serial 76134516

FIRSTRAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRSTRAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Warnick

MARK S WARNICK WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Search engine services for electronic communications networks; conversion and formatting of data for electronic communications networks for wireless communications devices; providing information on a wide variety of topics according to criteria selected by the user; providing updated information to the user based on topics and criteria set by userACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 30, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 16, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance