USPTO serial 76135025
ENMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alain Murad
DEBORAH J PECKHAM KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM75 STATE STATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | POLYCRYSTAL OR SINGLE CRYSTAL SILICON IN THE FORM OF WAFERS, CHIPS OR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR USE; SILICON EPITAXIAL WAFERS, CHIPS OR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR USE; POLYCRYSTAL OR SINGLE CRYSTAL GROUP III-V COMPOUND IN THE FORM WAFERS, CHIPS OR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR USE; EPITAXIAL WAFERS, CHIPS OR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS OF GROUP III-V COMPOUND FOR SEMICONDUCTOR USE; GROUP IV MATERIALS OR ALLOYS IN THE FORM OF EPITAXIAL WAFERS, CHIPS OR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR USE; ELECTRONIC AND OPTOELECTRONIC COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS, NAMELY EPITAXIAL WAFERS, CHIPS OR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL, SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES, AND LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, ALL RELATED TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSES, MATERIALS, DEVICES AND CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |