Drawing for BTINET

USPTO serial 76135109

BTINET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BTINET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Michael Harlow

E. THOMAS WATSON PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLPTHREE WACHOVIA CENTER401 S TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, IMAGES, AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; AND ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICESABANDONED
042DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 8, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 18, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 8, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 8, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 8, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Dec 3, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 3, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 12, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 26, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance