USPTO serial 76135109
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Michael Harlow
E. THOMAS WATSON PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLPTHREE WACHOVIA CENTER401 S TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, IMAGES, AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; AND ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |