Drawing for TCMS TOTAL COST MANAGEMENT SERVICES

USPTO serial 76135195

TCMS TOTAL COST MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TCMS TOTAL COST MANAGEMENT SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN, CHRISTINA L MARTINI AN DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and consultation in the field of inventory management; supply chain management; tool crib management; and business information management and business process re-engineering related to indirect materials managementACTIVEDec 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 6, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance