USPTO serial 76135315
MARCONI MAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARCONI MAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Svat
MARK S SVAT FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communication and telecommunication transport systems and equipment for the transmission and reception of voice, data and vision by telephone, data and video terminals comprised of communication and telecommunication processing equipment, namely input terminals, output terminals, recorders, monitors, data loggers, signal testers, signal processors, filters, coders, decoders, data-compressors, computers, transmitters, re-transmitters, multiplexers, network management controllers and switches; wires, cables and optical fibers for telecommunications; cable terminators and cable signal distributors; radio telecommunication equipment, namely if transmitters, receivers, aerials, mobile communication terminals, base stations, switching relays and scramblers; pagers, cell phones, and personal data assistants; satellites and ground-based satellite terminals; transportable, portable or mobile satellite terminals for voice, data and vision; equipment for the conversion of voice, vision and data signals into alternative data protocols, namely signal interpreters and translators; equipment for the modulation of voice, vision and data streams on radio or optical carrier signals, namely signal modulators; computer terminals for voice, data or vision input such that the terminals are operated by a programmed event or by a coin or by payment card; coin validation equipment, namely coin acceptors for separating good coins from counterfeits; magnetic, optical and electronic payment cards or tokens, and smart cards to permit means of commercial transaction; token and magnetically coded transaction card readers, smart card readers and tokens terminals capable of transmitting and receiving data by magnetic stripe or direct electrical contact or by remote electronic, electromagnetic or optical signals from electronic, electromagnetic or optical components; and software for the communication and telecommunication industries that receives, processes and transmits voice, data and vision signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |