Drawing for MAKAIBARI

USPTO serial 76135469

MAKAIBARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFITH, VENUS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKAIBARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin P. Hoffman

HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3856UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005foodstuffs for children and invalids; herbal tea for medical and therapeutic purposes inACTIVE—
030Flavorings (other than for essential oils); spices, vinegar, mustard, seasonings, herbs, honey; preparations for the production of beverages, insofar as included in class 30; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice tapioca, sago, herbal tea (not for medical or therapeutic purposes), tea essences, tea extracts, chicory and chicory mixtures, coffee extracts, coffee essences, chicory and chicory mixtures as coffee substitutes; cakes, biscuits (except as animal fodder), chocolate,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance