USPTO serial 76135716
WONDER SWAN COLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WONDER SWAN COLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Taito-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION, COMPUTER GAME TAPES AND COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAME DISKS, VENDING MACHINES, COMPUTERS, CABLES, BATTERIES, PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, BLANK AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES AND PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO DISKS FEATURING ANIMATED STORIES AND RHYMES; TELEPHONES, WIRELESS TELEPHONES, SUNGLASSES AND CAMERAS, NAMELY, VIDEO, PHONOGRAPHIC, 35MM, AND MOTION PICTURE CAMERAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |