USPTO serial 76135878
MHZ TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MHZ TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Central Virginia Educational Telecommunications Corporation
Falls Church, VA
Other trademarks owned by Central Virginia Educational Telecommunications Corporation
Central Virginia Educational Telecommunications Corporation
Falls Church, VA
Other trademarks owned by Central Virginia Educational Telecommunications Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin B Reed
BENJAMIN B REED WILEY REIN FIELDING1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Virginia Educational Telecommunications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Central Virginia Educational Telecommunications Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MHZ TV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |