USPTO serial 76135937
ULTRAFET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAFET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Lawton Rogers, III
MARK C COMTOIS DUANE MORRIS LLP1667 K ST N W STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TECHNICAL AND NON-TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS, TRANSISTORS AND SEMICONDUCTORS, NAMELY, DISCRETE AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES AND FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, AND TESTING FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS, SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, TRANSISTORS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS, TRANSISTORS AND SEMICONDUCTORS, NAMELY, DISCRETE AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES AND FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |