USPTO serial 76136467
MAVERICK TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2002
- Examiner
- AN, GI HYUN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAVERICK TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
Columbia, IL
Other trademarks owned by Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
Fairview Heights, IL
Other trademarks owned by Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
Fairview Heights, IL
Other trademarks owned by Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned W. Randle
Ned W. Randle POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI, L.C.12412 POWERSCOURT DRIVESuite 200ST. LOUIS, MO 63131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering and consulting services in the fields of information technology, automation, manufacturing, and electronic business, namely, scope development; front-end engineering; project estimation; bid-package development; engineering project management; enterprise resource planning systems; manufacturing plant documentation for operations, maintenance, engineering, service, and training departments; PLC/DCS/HMI specification/development/configuration; P and ID design/development; control narrative definition; detailed electrical instrumentation design; electrical instrument specification, evaluation, and procurement; electrical area classification; high-, medium-and low-voltage power distribution design/implementation; hardwirded safety interlock design; software safety interlock design; electrical heat trace design; electrical control cabinet construction; control cabinet design and layout; network design and layout; computer networking and system architecture design and implementation; Internet, intranet and extranet website drafting, design and development; process simulation/customer acceptance; SQL/custom database design/configuration; report generation; visual basic development; on-site checkout/startup | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Maverick Technologies Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAVERICK TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |