USPTO serial 76136515
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Marktheidenfeld, DE
Muchen, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen F. Goss
COLLEEN F GOSS FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, SALES PROMOTION ADVICE; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES; MARKETING RESEARCH; MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT OF BRANDS; ONLINE RETAIL SALES SERVICES FEATURING CONSUMER GOODS; SEARCH AND MEDIATION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH GOODS NAMELY, QUALITY AND PRICE; PROVIDING INFORMATION DATA VIA THE INTERNET; ORGANIZATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DOMAIN VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF INTERNET CONNECTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; ONLINE PROVISION OF INFORMATION IN CONNECTION WITH GOODS, OPERATION OF A CALL CENTER, NAMELY HANDLING OF CONTRACTS CONCERNING THE PURCHASING AND SELLING OF GOODS ONLINE; TELEPHONE HOTLINE COUNSELING SERVICES CONCERNING GOODS, NAMELY, PRICE AND QUALITY | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |