USPTO serial 76136660
CONSTRUCTION DIAMOND TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSTRUCTION DIAMOND TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter G. Pappas, Esq.
PLANET DIAMOND TOOLS ROME, GEORGIA 30161195 CHATILLON RD NE BOX 14ATLANTA, GA 30309-4416UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power tool components, namely, saw blades, bits, brushes, wheels, grinding points, blade sharpeners, files, rasps, sanding sheets, sanding belts, sanding discs, sand paper, joiner blades, and sharpening stones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |