USPTO serial 76136712
CROSSSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROSSSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing financial analysis and consultation services; electronic bill payment services; electronic transactions made using a credit card, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, including, providing hyperlinks to the web sites of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy services in the setting-up and operation of systems pertinent to data processing, data bases and telecommunication networks, planning, development and project-design of telecommunication and information processing services and facilities, telecommunication networks and pertinent tools, electronic services, in particular collecting, storing, translating, passing on or distributing of data, information, images, video and audio sequences, provision and communication of information stored on a database, in particular also by means of interactively communicating (computer) systems; development, generation and renting of data processing programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |