USPTO serial 76136905
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen, Esq.
GREGORY N. OWEN, ESQ. OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON P455 MARKET STREETSUITE 19SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2450| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | UNDERWRITING FINANCING, CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION, AND BROKERAGE OF LIFE INSURANCE; INSURANCE UNDERWRITING AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES ON A PREPAYMENT BASIS, RELATING TO MEDICAL CARE; PREPAID FINANCING AND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICAL CARE, PHARMACEUTICAL CARE AND RELATED HEALTH CARE SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS CONCERNING PREPAID FINANCING AND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICAL, HOSPITAL AND RELATED HEALTH CARE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |