Drawing for MY FINANCIAL VIEW

USPTO serial 76137212

MY FINANCIAL VIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY FINANCIAL VIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE GLADSTONE RESTAINO

LESLIE GLADSTONE RESTAINO BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER163 MADISON AVE P O BOX 1989MORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-1989UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Data aggregation and consolidation of financial information, recordation and management of financial information and finances, all over a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 30, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 14, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance