Drawing for R DART

USPTO serial 76137319

R DART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with R DART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L.M. MULLEN

MARK A PASKAR BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2750UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING ONLINE INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF PACKAGE DEVELOPMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CONSUMER PRODUCTSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 29, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance