USPTO serial 76137816
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Columbia City, IN, US
Columbia City, IN, US
Columbia City, IN, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Wever
Michael E. Wever BARNES & THORNBURG LLP888 S. Harrison Street, Suite 600FORT WAYNE, IN 46802UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | T-SLOTTED ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FOR MODULAR FRAMING SYSTEMS, AND METAL ACCESSORIES FOR THE T-SLOTTED ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS, NAMELY STANCHIONS, JOINING PLATES, SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, STUDS, ANCHOR FASTENERS, BUTT FASTENERS, END FASTENERS, WASHERS, T-NUTS, PIVOTS, BRACKETS, HINGES, HANDLES, LATCHES, MOUNTING PLATES, DOOR CATCHES, DOORS, DOOR SLIDE TRACKS, PANELS, PANEL STIFFENERS, MOUNTING BLOCKS, CLAMPS, PANEL RETAINERS, MANIFOLD PLATES, AND LINEAR BEARINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | NONMETAL ACCESSORIES FOR T-SLOTTED ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FOR MODULAR FRAMING SYSTEMS, NAMELY PANELS, DOORS, SPACE WHEELS AND PRE-MOLDED CORNERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | NONMETAL ACCESSORIES FOR T-SLOTTED ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FOR MODULAR FRAMING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, HANDLES, DOOR CATCHES, NONMETAL WIRE EDGING, PUSH IN FASTENERS, END CAP ASSEMBLIES, BINS, PLASTIC T-SLOT COVERS, TABLE TOPS, HANGERS, CLAMPS, FEET FOR USE ON FRAMING SYSTEMS, AND PLASTIC BEARING PADS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |