Drawing for TIME SQUAD

USPTO serial 76138612

TIME SQUAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIME SQUAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L Elgin

JENNIFER L ELGIN THE CARTOON NETWORK LP LLLPTRADEMARK COUNSELP O BOX 105573ATLANTA, GA 30348-5573

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods and printed matter, namely, stickers, calendars, trading cards, posters, paint sets for children, pens, pencils, children's books, binders, pencil cases, comic books, coloring books, postcards, greeting cards, paper party goods, namely hats, streamers, tablecloths, napkins, gift wrap, banners, door signs, tags, party decorations, lunch bags, and bank checksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance