USPTO serial 76138738
EARSKOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARSKOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Niebuhr
FREDERICK W NIEBUHR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CTR7900 XERXES AVE SBLOOMINGTON, MN 55431Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS HAVING HIGH INTENSITY LIGHT AND HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICS, FOR VIEWING THE EAR TO DETECT A SIGN OF INFECTION OR AN ACCUMULATION OF CERUMEN | ACTIVE | Dec 2, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |