USPTO serial 76139006
WEBCENTRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBCENTRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
#10-11/17 Starhub Centre, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen E. McCarthy
DOCKET ADMINSTRATOR MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT; COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF BUSINESS INFORMATION DATA; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; PREPARING BUSINESS REPORTS; CONDUCTING BUSINESS AND MARKET RESEARCH SURVEYS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE, AND CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES, DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; ELECTRONIC ORDER TRANSMISSION; FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; WIRELESS DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES; WIRELESS FACSIMILE MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES, LEASING OF DATABASE SPACE; MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RENTAL OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DESIGN OF COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FORMATTING BUSINESS REPORTS AND SURVEYS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FORMATTING BUSINESS REPORTS AND SURVEYS; BUSINESS CONSULTATION; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |