USPTO serial 76139261
WIRELESS BUSINESS ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2004
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIRELESS BUSINESS ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRISHA A DORE
TRISHA A DORE ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LTD401 W GEORGE ST STE 702VANCOUVER, BC V6B 5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS VOICE, DATA AND INFORMATION TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS *;AN INTEGRATED CLIENT/SERVER SOFTWARE PRODUCT THAT INTEGRATES WITH, AND WIRELESSLY ENABLES, THE MESSAGING CAPABILITIES OFFERED BY CLIENT APPLICATIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SECURE, WIRELESS ACCESS TO AN ORGANIZATIONS'S COMPUTER NETWORK INDEPENDENT OF WIRELESS PROTOCOL* | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2001 |
| 038 | DATA COMMUNICATION SERVICES NAMELY COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNICATIONS, PAGING SERVICES, VOICE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |