USPTO serial 76139527
MUSICSURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSICSURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein, Esq.
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN ESQ TECHMARKMARKET55 S MARKET ST FL 16SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2324Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers, computer network servers, computer printers, computer scanners; modems and communications interface cards; digital cameras; digital cameras for uploading ephotos, multimedia files, music files and images to and downloading from computers; wired or wireless communications terminals, handheld portable terminals and organizers, and Internet web browsers, all for connecting to and exchanging information over the Internet and local area, wide area and enterprise networks; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via the Internet or other computer network; computer software and software development tools and utilities software used for the creation, enhancement, modification, transmission, reception, exchange, storage, and synchronization of information, messages, audio and video data and files, music files, multimedia files, photographic and graphic files, ephotos and images, and wired or wireless e-mail with or without attached files, ephotos, music files and images, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, creating, designing, implementing and maintaining web site for others; web site hosting for others; custom design of software, hardware, digital cameras, computer and communications ships and circuit boards for others; providing technical consultation services with regards to creating, enhancing, modifying, transmitting, receiving, exchanging, storing and synchronizing information, audio and video data and files, music files, multimedia files, ephotos, photographic and graphic files and images, and e-mail with or without attached files and images; consulting and technical assistance services with regards to computer software, computer hardware, digital cameras and imaging, communications, synchronization of data between computer systems and between portable electronic devices, web site development, web site operation and maintenance; maintenance and support services for computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |