USPTO serial 76140012
THE LA COSTA RESORT & SPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LA COSTA RESORT & SPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | BATH ROBES, BATHING SUITS, JACKETS, HATS, SWEATSHIRTS, CAPS, AND T-SHIRTS | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 24, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |