Drawing for CONNECTED

USPTO serial 76140043

CONNECTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNECTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward F. Perlman

EDWARD F PERLMAN WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software which assists the backup and storage of networked filesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 22, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 23, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 25, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance