USPTO serial 76140313
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Rannells
JOHN M RANNELLS BAKER & RANNELLS359 E MAIN STSOMERVILLE, NJ 08876-3126UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Product fulfillment services to e-Commerce and 'brick and mortar retailers in the nature of outsourced hardware and software procurement and facilitation; such hardware being comprised of telephone devices and data networking products, namely, cellular, wireless, wireline, screen and packet switched protocol telephones, global communication information network to telephony network bridges, control servers, addressing servers, fax servers, electronic commerce stations and interactive voice replay servers, wireless devices, pagers, palm writers, electric, electronic and communications hardware, data voice and video communication hardware, telephone controllers, telephone hand sets, battery charging stations, telephone jacks, and wireless communication devices which allow users to retrieve, send, listen to and respond to electronic mail using wireless communication devices; and computer software, namely, for use in PC to telephone, PC to PC and telephone to telephone communications via communication networks, namely, via telephony networks, local area networks, wide area networks, global communication information networks, local computer networks, and television cable networks or such networks that employ a global computer information network protocol; service fulfillment services to e-Commerce and 'brick and mortar' retailers in the nature of management of distribution bases and the design, development and maintenance of client enterprise processes and data, namely credit scoring, pick, pack and ship services, customer service programs; consulting programs, support services, turnkey, ongoing site management and informational content updates, 'live' subscriber validation, order processing, e-mail updates and notification, follow-ups, intemet order tracking, and returns processing; wireless device activation services; retail store services in fields of telephone, telecommunications and data networking devices and accessories, and electric, electronic and communications hardware and software; consulting services in the fields of wireless communications networks design | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |