USPTO serial 76141159
PIX CINEMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIX CINEMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | MOTION PICTURE DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, NAMELY, DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURES FOR DISPLAY IN THEATERS, IN COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND FOR HOME USE DIGITALLY VIA THE INTERNET, CABLE TELEVISION, AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | MOTION PICTURE DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, NAMELY, DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURES FOR DISPLAY IN THEATERS, IN COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND FOR HOME USE THROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDED COPIES, DIGITALLY VIA THE INTERNET, CABLE TELEVISION AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INVESTISSEMENTS DANIEL LANGLOIS INC. / DANIEL LANGLOIS INVESTMENTS INC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PIX CINEMA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |