USPTO serial 76141368
WS LAW MATTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3078018Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WS LAW MATTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Warren Shepell Consultants Corp.
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1T9, CA
Warren Shepell Consultants Corp.
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1T9, CA
Warren Shepell Consultants Corp.
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1T9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY J LYDEN
Timothy J. Lyden Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.7930 Jones Branch DriveBox Intellectual PropertyMcLean, VA 22102Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Warren Shepell Consultants Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Warren Shepell Consultants Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Warren Shepell Consultants Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WS LAW MATTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |