USPTO serial 76141756
CINEKID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINEKID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James N. Palik, Esq.
JAMES N PALIK ESQ PENNIE EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10036-2720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIER MEDIA AND BLANK MAGNETIC OR OPTICAL RECORDING DISCS; PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES, CDS, CD-ROMS DDS FEATURING CHILDREN FILMS; VIDEO GAME CHAINS FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT, NAMELY JOYSTICKS AND CONTROL UNITS; UNEXPOSED VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM; PRERECORDED MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING CHILDREN'S FILMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CHILDREN'S CLOTHING NAMELY, SHIRTS, TEE SHIRTS, SOCKS, HATS, CAPS, HEAD BANDS, SCARVES, PANTS, SHIRTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SWEATERS; FOOT WEAR AND HEAD WEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY BROADCASTING PROGRAMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPOFAST, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPOFAST, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CINEKID
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |