USPTO serial 76141889
AUDIO ALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AUDIO ALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Safety Technology International, Inc.
Waterford, MI
Other trademarks owned by Safety Technology International, Inc.
Safety Technology International, Inc.
Waterford, MI
Other trademarks owned by Safety Technology International, Inc.
SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
WATERFORD, MI
Other trademarks owned by SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest I. Gifford
Ernest I. Gifford Gifford, Krass,Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.CP.O. Box 70212701 Troy Center Drive, Suite 330Troy, MI 48007-7021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DEVICE TO BE AUTOMATICALLY ACTUATED BY A PATIENT TO EMIT AN ALARM WHEN THE PATIENT LEAVES HIS/HER BED OR WHEELCHAIR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Safety Technology International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Safety Technology International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AUDIO ALERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |