Drawing for I

USPTO serial 76141963

I

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly L. Williams

KELLY L WILLIAMS EDWARDS & ANGELL LLPPO BOX 55874BOSTON, MA 02205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH SOFTWARE FOR BROWSING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, TO CONTROL AND AUTOMATE THE BROWSER VIA A TOOLBARACTIVE—
035(Based on Intent to Use) Advertising and promotional services, namely, promoting sales of goods and services through the placement of advertisement and promotional displays on global computer network browser software; and promoting the sale of the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contestsACTIVE—
041(Based on Intent to Use) Providing computerized virtual slot machines that may be accessed network-wide by computer usersACTIVE—
042(Based on Intent to Use) Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining a wide range of general interest information and providing online web links to other Web sites related thereto via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 11, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance